About This Market
Arthur Gea vs.
Arthur Gea vs. Zachary Svajda: ATP Tennis match held on 2026-09-03. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi, Polymarket, and more on Prediction.com.
Arthur Gea vs. Zachary Svajda
Arthur Gea vs. Zachary Svajda
Live prediction market odds for Arthur Gea vs. Zachary Svajda. Compare prices across .
ATP Listed Resolved
This market resolved on Sep 4, 2026. Arthur Gea was the officially declared outcome.
Arthur Gea vs.
Arthur Gea vs. Zachary Svajda: ATP Tennis match held on 2026-09-03. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi, Polymarket, and more on Prediction.com.
| Question | Result |
|---|---|
Arthur GeaWINNER | Yes |
Zachary Svajda | No |
Official settlement criteria, resolution sources, and edge cases across Kalshi and Polymarket and Polymarket US and ProphetX.
KalshiIf Zachary Svajda wins the Svajda vs Gea professional tennis match in the 2026 US Open Men Singles Round Of 64 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.
The following market refers to the Svajda vs Gea professional tennis match in the 2026 US Open Men Singles Round Of 64 after a ball has been played. If the match does not occur (signaled by a ball being played) due to a player injury, walkover, forfeiture, or any other cancellation (all before the match starts), the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with the rules. If this match is postponed or delayed, the market will remain open and close after the rescheduled match has finished (within two weeks). Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
PolymarketThis market refers to the tennis match between Zachary Svajda and Arthur Gea in the US Open ATP, originally scheduled for September 3, 2026 at 11:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Zachary Svajda' if Zachary Svajda advances against Arthur Gea. This market will resolve to 'Arthur Gea' if Arthur Gea advances against Zachary Svajda. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 17, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Polymarket USThis market will settle to the winner of the Zachary Svajda vs Arthur Gea ATP match scheduled for September 3 at 4:00PM. If the match does not begin due to a walkover, forfeit, injury, or any other cancellation prior to the first point being played, the market will settle to fair market price. If a player retires during the match, the opponent will be recorded as the winner. Outcome sourced from ATP.
ProphetXSports moneyline - resolves based on official game outcome per ProphetX Prediction Rules
The outcomes listed above show how traders are pricing this question. Venue prices are not currently available on this page. Each price reflects the market’s implied probability, not a guaranteed result. This event is archived; prices shown are historical.
No historical prices are available on this page. The last available price is not necessarily the final settlement price.
Venues have different traders, liquidity and fees, so their prices can differ. A cross-platform comparison needs available prices for the same outcome on at least two venues.
For example, a 40¢ price implies about a 40% chance. For a standard $1 contract, a share pays $1 if its outcome settles as correct and $0 if it settles as incorrect. A winning share bought at 40¢ earns 60¢ before fees. Check each venue’s settlement rules, fees and eligibility before trading. Historical prices alone do not identify the winning outcome.