Live prediction market odds for Ana Clara Furlan Britzki vs. Julia Konishi Camargo Silva. Compare prices across Kalshi and Polymarket US and Polymarket.
ITF Women·Resolved 2026-09-16
This market resolved on 2026-09-16. Julia Konishi Camargo Silva was the officially declared outcome. Prior to resolution, the market peaked at 92%.
Ana Clara Furlan Britzki vs.
Ana Clara Furlan Britzki vs. Julia Konishi Camargo Silva: ITF Women's World Tennis Tour match held on 2026-09-16. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi and Polymarket on Prediction Hunt.
| Candidate |  |  |  |
|---|---|---|---|
Julia Konishi Camargo SilvaWINNER | 100% | 57% | 92% |
Ana Clara Furlan Britzki | 1% | 7% | 8% |
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
82.8% avg
Official settlement criteria, resolution sources, and edge cases across Polymarket US.
Polymarket USThis market will settle to the winner of the Julia Konishi Camargo Silva vs Ana Clara Furlan Britzki ITF match scheduled for Sep 16, 2026. If the match does not begin due to a walkover, withdrawal, or cancellation, the market will settle to $0.50. If the match is delayed, postponed, or suspended and not rescheduled to a date within two weeks of the originally scheduled date, the market will settle to $0.50. Outcome sourced from ITF.
The outcomes listed above show how traders are pricing this question. Compare outcome prices from Kalshi, Polymarket US, Polymarket in one place. Each price reflects the market’s implied probability, not a guaranteed result. This event is archived; prices shown are historical.
The last available prices are Julia Konishi Camargo Silva: 99.5¢ on Kalshi, 92.0¢ on Polymarket, 57.0¢ on Polymarket US; Ana Clara Furlan Britzki: 0.5¢ on Kalshi, 8.0¢ on Polymarket, 7.0¢ on Polymarket US. Prices are quoted in cents per $1 share. Check the venue for executable prices and available liquidity. The last available price is not necessarily the final settlement price.
The largest price difference shown across venues is 42.5 percentage points. Venues have different traders, liquidity and fees, so their prices can differ. A price gap alone does not establish an executable arbitrage opportunity; compare settlement rules and the actual buy and sell prices.
For example, Julia Konishi Camargo Silva at 82.8¢ implies about a 82.8% chance. For a standard $1 contract, a share pays $1 if its outcome settles as correct and $0 if it settles as incorrect. A winning share bought at 40¢ earns 60¢ before fees. Check each venue’s settlement rules, fees and eligibility before trading. Historical prices alone do not identify the winning outcome.
