Live prediction market odds for Martina Macarena Torrales Tebes vs. Manuela Maia Citolino. Compare prices across Kalshi and Polymarket US and Polymarket.
ITF Women·Resolved 2026-09-21
This market resolved on 2026-09-21. Manuela Maia Citolino was the officially declared outcome. Prior to resolution, the market peaked at 99%.
Martina Macarena Torrales Tebes vs.
Martina Macarena Torrales Tebes vs. Manuela Maia Citolino: ITF Women's World Tennis Tour match held on 2026-09-21. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi and Polymarket on Prediction Hunt.
| Candidate |  |  |  |
|---|---|---|---|
Manuela Maia CitolinoWINNER | 99% | 99% | 100% |
Martina Macarena Torrales Tebes | 1% | 1% | 0% |
Manuela Maia Citolino
99.3% avg
Official settlement criteria, resolution sources, and edge cases across Polymarket US.
Polymarket USThis market will settle to the winner of the Manuela Maia Citolino vs Martina Macarena Torrales Tebes ITF match scheduled for Sep 21, 2026. If the match does not begin due to a walkover, withdrawal, or cancellation, the market will settle to $0.50. If the match is delayed, postponed, or suspended and not rescheduled to a date within two weeks of the originally scheduled date, the market will settle to $0.50. Outcome sourced from ITF.
The outcomes listed above show how traders are pricing this question. Compare outcome prices from Kalshi, Polymarket US, Polymarket in one place. Each price reflects the market’s implied probability, not a guaranteed result. This event is archived; prices shown are historical.
The last available prices are Manuela Maia Citolino: 99.0¢ on Kalshi, 99.9¢ on Polymarket, 99.0¢ on Polymarket US; Martina Macarena Torrales Tebes: 1.0¢ on Kalshi, 0.1¢ on Polymarket, 1.0¢ on Polymarket US. Prices are quoted in cents per $1 share. Check the venue for executable prices and available liquidity. The last available price is not necessarily the final settlement price.
The largest price difference shown across venues is 0.9 percentage points. Venues have different traders, liquidity and fees, so their prices can differ. A price gap alone does not establish an executable arbitrage opportunity; compare settlement rules and the actual buy and sell prices.
For example, Manuela Maia Citolino at 99.3¢ implies about a 99.3% chance. For a standard $1 contract, a share pays $1 if its outcome settles as correct and $0 if it settles as incorrect. A winning share bought at 40¢ earns 60¢ before fees. Check each venue’s settlement rules, fees and eligibility before trading. Historical prices alone do not identify the winning outcome.
