About This Market
Emma Slavikova vs.
Emma Slavikova vs. Ashleigh Harvey: ITF Women's World Tennis Tour match held on 2026-09-27. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi and Polymarket on Prediction Hunt.
Live prediction market odds for Emma Slavikova vs. Ashleigh Harvey. Compare prices across Kalshi and Polymarket US and Polymarket.

ITF Women·Resolved 2026-09-27
This market resolved on 2026-09-27. Emma Slavikova was the officially declared outcome. Prior to resolution, the market peaked at 99%.
Emma Slavikova vs.
Emma Slavikova vs. Ashleigh Harvey: ITF Women's World Tennis Tour match held on 2026-09-27. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi and Polymarket on Prediction Hunt.
| Candidate | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|---|
Emma SlavikovaWINNER | 99% | 99% | 92% |
Ashleigh Harvey | 1% | 1% | 8% |
Emma Slavikova
96.7% avg
Official settlement criteria, resolution sources, and edge cases across Polymarket US.
Polymarket USThis market will settle to the winner of the Ashleigh Harvey vs Emma Slavikova ITF match scheduled for Sep 27, 2026. If the match does not begin due to a walkover, withdrawal, or cancellation, the market will settle to $0.50. If the match is delayed, postponed, or suspended and not rescheduled to a date within two weeks of the originally scheduled date, the market will settle to $0.50. Outcome sourced from ITF.
The outcomes listed above show how traders are pricing this question. Compare outcome prices from Kalshi, Polymarket US, Polymarket in one place. Each price reflects the market’s implied probability, not a guaranteed result. This event is archived; prices shown are historical.
The last available prices are Emma Slavikova: 99.0¢ on Kalshi, 92.0¢ on Polymarket, 99.0¢ on Polymarket US; Ashleigh Harvey: 1.0¢ on Kalshi, 8.0¢ on Polymarket, 1.0¢ on Polymarket US. Prices are quoted in cents per $1 share. Check the venue for executable prices and available liquidity. The last available price is not necessarily the final settlement price.
The largest price difference shown across venues is 7.0 percentage points. Venues have different traders, liquidity and fees, so their prices can differ. A price gap alone does not establish an executable arbitrage opportunity; compare settlement rules and the actual buy and sell prices.
For example, Emma Slavikova at 96.7¢ implies about a 96.7% chance. For a standard $1 contract, a share pays $1 if its outcome settles as correct and $0 if it settles as incorrect. A winning share bought at 40¢ earns 60¢ before fees. Check each venue’s settlement rules, fees and eligibility before trading. Historical prices alone do not identify the winning outcome.