Defiance Act Hits 34% Odds Despite Zero House Committee Action

---

A Federal Court and a New York Lawsuit Just Sent Prediction Market Odds Surging, Including for the Defiance Act

New York officials filed a lawsuit against Kalshi this week, calling it an "illegal, unlicensed gambling operation" and seeking penalties that could total $36 billion. Days earlier, a federal judge in Minnesota blocked a first-in-the-nation state law that would have criminalized prediction market operations, ruling in favor of the CFTC, Kalshi, and Polymarket. On the same day New York sued, the CFTC fined former U.S. Representative George Santos $17,500 and forced him to return $17,569.98 in profits for manipulating Kalshi trades tied to his own State of the Union attendance.

None of these events have anything to do with the Defiance Act, a bipartisan bill targeting nonconsensual deepfake imagery. Yet the bill's implied probability of becoming law in 2026 jumped from 24% to 34% over the past three days across Kalshi and Polymarket. The period low sat at 22%, making the swing from trough to current price a full 12 percentage points. The entire move occurred without a single new development in the bill's House journey. That disconnect is the story.

---

What Is the Defiance Act and Why Is It Trading at 34% to Become Law in 2026?

The Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits Act, sponsored by Senators Dick Durbin and Lindsey Graham, creates a federal civil cause of action for victims of sexually explicit deepfakes. The Senate passed it unanimously on January 13, 2026. OpenAI endorsed it in June 2026, becoming the first AI company to do so. The bill enjoys genuine bipartisan goodwill and faces no organized industry opposition.

The problem is procedural. The House version, H.R. 3562, was referred to the House Judiciary Committee but, as of June 26, 2026, had not received a single committee hearing or markup. Five months remain before the market's December 31, 2026 resolution date, but the House calendar is finite, and bills without committee action rarely reach the floor. A 34% implied probability for a bill stuck in procedural limbo is aggressive. It implies roughly one-in-three odds that the House will schedule, hear, mark up, pass, and send this bill to the president's desk in the remaining legislative window.

---

How Prediction Market Drama Inflates Individual Bill Odds

The mechanism here is straightforward: legitimacy events drive new user signups. When prediction markets dominate headlines for reasons unrelated to any specific contract, fresh capital enters the ecosystem. New traders tend to be category-bullish. They scan available markets, find contracts they find intuitively appealing, and bid them up. A bill that combats deepfakes, passed the Senate unanimously, and has OpenAI's endorsement is exactly the kind of contract that attracts optimistic newcomers.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez's ruling blocking Minnesota's ban was a direct endorsement of federal primacy over prediction market regulation. The New York lawsuit against Kalshi, while hostile in intent, reinforced a narrative that prediction markets are large enough to warrant state attorney general attention. Even the Santos fine served as proof that the CFTC takes enforcement on these platforms seriously, which paradoxically bolsters their legitimacy as regulated financial instruments. Each story pushed prediction markets into mainstream news cycles, creating a funnel for new participants.

The Defiance Act is especially susceptible to this spillover because it sits at the intersection of technology regulation and political consensus. Traders arriving from a news cycle about prediction market legitimacy are predisposed to view bipartisan, tech-adjacent legislation favorably. The 11-point move reflects sentiment about the prediction market category's viability, not a reassessment of the House Judiciary Committee's calendar.

---

The Strongest Case Against This Price: The House Calendar Is the Constraint

The bull case for the Defiance Act is real. Unanimous Senate passage, zero organized opposition, bipartisan sponsorship, and a cultural moment around AI-generated abuse all point toward a bill that should become law. But "should" and "will by December 31" are different questions. The House Judiciary Committee has not signaled any intention to prioritize H.R. 3562. Committee Chair Jim Jordan has a crowded docket of immigration, criminal justice, and tech antitrust matters competing for floor time.

Bills that pass the Senate unanimously sometimes get adopted by the House through suspension of the rules, bypassing committee entirely. That procedure requires two-thirds support on the floor. Given the Defiance Act's bipartisan appeal, suspension is plausible, but it requires House leadership to schedule the vote, and there is no public indication that Speaker Johnson's office has done so. A 34% implied probability prices in a meaningful chance of suspension passage or a late-session committee sprint. Both are possible. Neither is currently in motion.

---

Track the Defiance Act's Odds in Real Time

Prediction-market view

Live prices, venue by venue

Compare the latest YES price at each venue. Check market rules, liquidity, and fees before trading.

DEFIANCE Act

Consensus YES price across 2 venues

3%average

PolymarketBest YES price3.6¢Kalshi4.5¢

College sports federalization

Consensus YES price across 1 venues

47%average

KalshiBest YES price47¢

ADS-B revenue-use restriction

Consensus YES price across 1 venues

28%average

KalshiBest YES price29¢

Insulin cost cap

Consensus YES price across 1 venues

36%average

KalshiBest YES price60¢

Current new-user offer · Kalshi

Get a $35 trading bonusCode PRED35

New users only. Eligibility restrictions and terms apply.

View current offer

The core tension in this market is the gap between legislative merit and legislative mechanics. The Defiance Act is a popular bill with no enemies and strong cultural tailwinds. It is also a bill with no scheduled House action and five months of runway. This week's 11-point move was driven by traders excited about prediction markets themselves, not by anyone with inside knowledge of a House markup. If H.R. 3562 appears on a committee calendar or a suspension calendar in the coming weeks, 34% will look cheap in hindsight. If it doesn't, this price is a sentiment artifact that will decay as the December 31 resolution date approaches and the House calendar tightens. Watch the committee schedule. That is the only signal that matters now.