About This Market
Fordham Rams vs.
Fordham Rams vs. Coastal Carolina Chanticleers: College Football game held on 2026-09-12. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi, Polymarket, and more on Prediction Hunt.
Live prediction market odds for Fordham Rams vs. Coastal Carolina Chanticleers. Compare prices across Kalshi and Polymarket US and Novig and Polymarket and ProphetX.

College Football·Resolved 2026-09-12
This market resolved on 2026-09-12. Coastal Carolina Chanticleers was the officially declared outcome. Prior to resolution, the market peaked at 98%.
Fordham Rams vs.
Fordham Rams vs. Coastal Carolina Chanticleers: College Football game held on 2026-09-12. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi, Polymarket, and more on Prediction Hunt.
| Candidate | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 10.5 | 100% | — | — | 100% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 14.5 | 99% | — | — | 100% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 33.5 | 99% | — | — | 100% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 32.5 | — | — | — | 99% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 20.5 | 99% | — | — | 99% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 24.5 | 99% | — | — | 99% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 8.5 | — | — | — | 99% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 1.5 | — | — | — | 99% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 2.5 | — | — | — | 99% | — |
Coastal Carolina ChanticleersWINNER | 99% | 50% | 98% | 0% | 98% |
Fordham Rams spread plus 20.5 | — | — | — | 96% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 13.5 | 99% | — | — | 91% | — |
Total over 33.5 | 99% | — | — | 81% | — |
Total over 35.5 | — | — | — | 76% | — |
Total over 37.5 | — | — | — | 75% | — |
Total over 39.5 | 99% | — | — | 74% | — |
Total under 67.5 | — | — | — | 72% | — |
Total under 69.5 | — | — | — | 72% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 48.5 | — | — | — | 71% | — |
Total over 41.5 | — | — | — | 71% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 50.5 | — | — | — | 71% | — |
Total under 65.5 | — | — | — | 71% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 47.5 | — | — | — | 69% | — |
Total over 43.5 | — | — | — | 69% | — |
Total under 61.5 | — | — | — | 68% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 26.5 | — | — | — | 67% | — |
Total under 59.5 | — | — | — | 67% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 28.5 | — | — | — | 66% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 29.5 | — | — | — | 65% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 31.5 | — | — | — | 65% | — |
Total under 63.5 | — | — | — | 65% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 44.5 | — | — | — | 64% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 42.5 | — | — | — | 63% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 30.5 | 100% | — | — | 62% | — |
Total under 55.5 | — | — | — | 61% | — |
Total under 57.5 | — | — | — | 61% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 41.5 | — | — | — | 59% | — |
Total over 47.5 | — | — | — | 59% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 40.5 | — | — | — | 57% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 17.5 | 100% | — | — | 56% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 38.5 | — | — | — | 56% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 39.5 | — | — | — | 56% | — |
Total under 51.5 | — | — | — | 56% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 51.5 | — | — | — | 55% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 38.5 | 1% | — | — | 55% | — |
Total over 45.5 | 99% | — | — | 54% | — |
Total over 49.5 | — | — | — | 54% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 36.5 | — | — | — | 53% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 23.5 | 100% | — | — | 52% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 34.5 | — | — | — | 52% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 35.5 | 100% | — | — | 52% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 21.5 | 99% | — | — | 51% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 37.5 | — | — | — | 51% | — |
Total over 51.5 | 99% | — | — | 50% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 31.5 | 99% | — | — | 50% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 37.5 | — | — | — | 49% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 21.5 | — | — | — | 49% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 24.5 | — | — | — | 49% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 23.5 | — | — | — | 48% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 34.5 | — | — | — | 48% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 35.5 | — | — | — | 48% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 36.5 | — | — | — | 48% | — |
Total under 45.5 | — | — | — | 47% | — |
Total under 49.5 | — | — | — | 47% | — |
Total under 71.5 | — | — | — | 46% | — |
Total under 73.5 | — | — | — | 46% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 51.5 | 1% | — | — | 45% | — |
Total under 52.5 | — | — | — | 45% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 33.5 | — | — | — | 45% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 39.5 | — | — | — | 44% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 17.5 | — | — | — | 44% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 40.5 | — | — | — | 43% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 41.5 | 1% | — | — | 41% | — |
Total under 47.5 | — | — | — | 41% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 30.5 | — | — | — | 38% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 42.5 | — | — | — | 38% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 44.5 | — | — | — | 36% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 29.5 | — | — | — | 35% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 28.5 | — | — | — | 35% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 26.5 | — | — | — | 33% | — |
Total over 59.5 | — | — | — | 33% | — |
Total over 61.5 | — | — | — | 32% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 47.5 | — | — | — | 32% | — |
Total under 43.5 | — | — | — | 32% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 27.5 | — | — | — | 30% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 50.5 | — | — | — | 30% | — |
Total over 65.5 | — | — | — | 30% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 48.5 | 1% | — | — | 29% | — |
Total under 41.5 | — | — | — | 29% | — |
Total over 67.5 | — | — | — | 28% | — |
Total under 39.5 | — | — | — | 26% | — |
Total under 37.5 | — | — | — | 25% | — |
Total under 35.5 | — | — | — | 24% | — |
Total under 33.5 | — | — | — | 20% | — |
Total under 53.5 | — | — | — | 17% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 16.5 | — | — | — | 10% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 13.5 | — | — | — | 9% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 27.5 | 99% | — | — | 6% | — |
Fordham Rams | 1% | 6% | 2% | 0% | 24% |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 16.5 | 99% | — | — | 4% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 1.5 | — | — | — | 1% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 2.5 | — | — | — | 1% | — |
Total over 52.5 | 1% | — | — | 1% | — |
Total over 53.5 | 1% | — | — | 1% | — |
Total over 55.5 | 1% | — | — | 1% | — |
Total over 57.5 | 1% | — | — | 1% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 32.5 | — | — | — | 1% | — |
Total over 63.5 | 1% | — | — | 1% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 14.5 | — | — | — | 1% | — |
Total over 69.5 | 1% | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 10.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 8.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 0.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 19.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 25.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 3.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 4.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 5.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 54.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 6.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Fordham Rams spread plus 7.5 | — | — | — | 0% | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 0.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 19.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 25.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 3.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 4.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 5.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 54.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 6.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers spread minus 7.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina wins by over 11.5 points | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina wins by over 45.5 points | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 36.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 42.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 48.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 54.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 56.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 60.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 66.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 72.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 75.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Total over 71.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Total over 73.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
Coastal Carolina Chanticleers
69.0% avg
Official settlement criteria, resolution sources, and edge cases across Kalshi and Novig and Polymarket and Polymarket US and ProphetX.
KalshiIf Coastal Carolina wins the Fordham vs Coastal Carolina college football game originally scheduled for Sep 12, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.
If the game is postponed but begins within 48 hours of its originally scheduled start time, the market will remain open and resolve based on the official final result. If the game is cancelled or not started within 48 hours of its originally scheduled start, the market will resolve to a fair price. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the NCAA. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
NovigCoastal Carolina Chanticleers in Fordham @ Coastal Carolina (NCAAF); settled by Novig.
If the contract cannot be settled on the stated outcome, Novig settles it at fair market value (FMV) instead of refunding it.
PolymarketIn the upcoming college football game between Fordham and Coastal Carolina, scheduled for September 12 at 7:30PM ET: This market will resolve to "Fordham" if Fordham win the game. This market will resolve to "Coastal Carolina" if Coastal Carolina win the game. Overtime is included if played. If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50. If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
Polymarket USThis market will settle to the winner of the Rams vs Chanticleers College Football game scheduled for Sep 12, 2026. Overtime is included if played. If a tied final score is reported and no official winner is declared, this market will not resolve automatically and will be reviewed against the official governing-body result. If the game is delayed, postponed, or suspended and not rescheduled to a date within two weeks of the originally scheduled date, the market will settle to the last fair market price. Outcome sourced from the relevant governing body.
Sports moneyline - resolves based on official game outcome per ProphetX Prediction Rules
The outcomes listed above show how traders are pricing this question. Compare outcome prices from Kalshi, Polymarket US, Novig, Polymarket, ProphetX in one place. Each price reflects the market’s implied probability, not a guaranteed result. This event is archived; prices shown are historical.
The last available prices are Coastal Carolina Chanticleers: 99.0¢ on Kalshi, 0.1¢ on Polymarket, 98.1¢ on ProphetX, 50.0¢ on Polymarket US, 97.7¢ on Novig; Fordham Rams: 0.5¢ on Kalshi, 0.1¢ on Polymarket, 24.5¢ on ProphetX, 6.0¢ on Polymarket US, 2.3¢ on Novig. Prices are quoted in cents per $1 share. Check the venue for executable prices and available liquidity. The last available price is not necessarily the final settlement price.
The largest price difference shown across venues is 98.9 percentage points. Venues have different traders, liquidity and fees, so their prices can differ. A price gap alone does not establish an executable arbitrage opportunity; compare settlement rules and the actual buy and sell prices.
For example, Coastal Carolina Chanticleers at 69.0¢ implies about a 69.0% chance. For a standard $1 contract, a share pays $1 if its outcome settles as correct and $0 if it settles as incorrect. A winning share bought at 40¢ earns 60¢ before fees. Check each venue’s settlement rules, fees and eligibility before trading. Historical prices alone do not identify the winning outcome.