About This Market
UTEP Miners vs.
UTEP Miners vs. Michigan Wolverines: College Football game held on 2026-09-19. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi, Polymarket, and more on Prediction Hunt.
Live prediction market odds for UTEP Miners vs. Michigan Wolverines. Compare prices across Kalshi and Polymarket US and Novig and Polymarket and ProphetX.

College Football·Resolved 2026-09-19
This market resolved on 2026-09-19. Michigan Wolverines was the officially declared outcome. Prior to resolution, the market peaked at 97%.
UTEP Miners vs.
UTEP Miners vs. Michigan Wolverines: College Football game held on 2026-09-19. Review the historical prediction market odds from Kalshi, Polymarket, and more on Prediction Hunt.
| Candidate | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 28.5 | — | — | — | 100% | — |
Total over 62.5 | — | — | — | 100% | — |
Michigan WolverinesWINNER | 97% | 95% | 99% | 98% | 97% |
UTEP Miners spread plus 51.5 | — | — | — | 96% | — |
Total under 28.5 | — | — | — | 94% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 48.5 | — | — | — | 90% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 54.5 | — | — | — | 89% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 33.5 | — | — | — | 88% | — |
Total over 46.5 | 88% | — | — | 86% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 50.5 | — | — | — | 85% | — |
Total over 34.5 | 73% | — | — | 96% | — |
Total under 64.5 | — | — | — | 81% | — |
Over 51.5 points scored | 77% | — | — | — | — |
Total over 32.5 | — | — | — | 76% | — |
Total over 36.5 | — | — | — | 74% | — |
Total over 38.5 | — | — | — | 74% | — |
Total over 66.5 | — | — | — | 72% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 42.5 | — | — | — | 72% | — |
Total over 68.5 | — | — | — | 71% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 35.5 | — | — | 87% | 53% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 20.5 | — | — | — | 70% | — |
Total over 50.5 | 84% | — | — | 56% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 31.5 | — | — | — | 69% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 32.5 | — | — | — | 69% | — |
Total over 28.5 | 87% | — | — | 50% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 20.5 | 66% | — | — | 70% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 16.5 | 80% | — | — | 54% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 36.5 | — | — | — | 67% | — |
Total over 49.5 | 86% | — | 47% | — | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 44.5 | — | — | — | 66% | — |
Total over 40.5 | 56% | — | — | 74% | — |
Total over 54.5 | — | — | — | 63% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 23.5 | — | — | 51% | 73% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 39.5 | — | — | — | 62% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 13.5 | — | — | — | 61% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 38.5 | — | — | — | 61% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 17.5 | 74% | — | — | 47% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 29.5 | — | — | — | 61% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 40.5 | — | — | — | 61% | — |
Total over 42.5 | — | — | — | 60% | — |
Total over 44.5 | — | — | — | 60% | — |
Total over 52.5 | 68% | — | — | 51% | — |
Total under 60.5 | — | — | — | 56% | — |
Total over 56.5 | — | — | — | 55% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 26.5 | — | — | — | 55% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 38.5 | 11% | — | — | 98% | — |
Total over 30.5 | — | — | — | 53% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 47.5 | — | — | — | 52% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 27.5 | 34% | — | — | 70% | — |
Total under 52.5 | — | — | — | 51% | — |
Total under 58.5 | — | — | — | 51% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 34.5 | — | — | 52% | 50% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 19.5 | — | — | — | 50% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 50.5 | — | — | — | 50% | — |
Total over 48.5 | 84% | — | 50% | 50% | — |
Total under 32.5 | — | — | — | 50% | — |
Total under 48.5 | — | — | 50% | 50% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 37.5 | — | — | — | 50% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 41.5 | 8% | — | — | 91% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 34.5 | — | — | 49% | 50% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 23.5 | 61% | — | 49% | 27% | — |
Total under 34.5 | — | — | — | 49% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 47.5 | — | — | — | 48% | — |
Total under 30.5 | — | — | — | 48% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 17.5 | — | — | — | 47% | — |
Total over 58.5 | 45% | — | — | 49% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 16.5 | — | — | — | 46% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 29.5 | — | — | — | 46% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 35.5 | 13% | — | 45% | 47% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 25.5 | — | — | — | 45% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 26.5 | — | — | — | 44% | — |
Total over 60.5 | — | — | — | 44% | — |
Total under 56.5 | — | — | — | 44% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 19.5 | — | — | — | 43% | — |
Total under 46.5 | — | — | — | 43% | — |
Total under 50.5 | — | — | — | 42% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 30.5 | 21% | — | — | 62% | — |
Total under 42.5 | — | — | — | 40% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 40.5 | — | — | — | 40% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 30.5 | — | — | — | 38% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 39.5 | — | — | — | 38% | — |
Total under 54.5 | — | — | — | 37% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 28.5 | — | — | — | 35% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 44.5 | — | — | — | 35% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 36.5 | — | — | — | 33% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 42.5 | — | — | — | 33% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 32.5 | — | — | — | 31% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 27.5 | — | — | — | 30% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 31.5 | — | — | — | 30% | — |
Total under 66.5 | — | — | — | 29% | — |
Total under 68.5 | — | — | — | 29% | — |
Total under 44.5 | — | — | — | 28% | — |
Total under 36.5 | — | — | — | 26% | — |
Total under 38.5 | — | — | — | 26% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 25.5 | — | — | — | 26% | — |
Total under 40.5 | — | — | — | 25% | — |
Total over 64.5 | 24% | — | — | 23% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 37.5 | — | — | — | 23% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 13.5 | — | — | — | 20% | — |
UTEP Miners spread plus 41.5 | — | — | — | 17% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 33.5 | 13% | — | — | 13% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 54.5 | 5% | — | — | 11% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 51.5 | 5% | — | — | 9% | — |
Michigan Wolverines spread minus 48.5 | 3% | — | — | 10% | — |
UTEP Miners | 4% | 5% | 1% | 2% | 5% |
Total under 62.5 | — | — | — | 1% | — |
Michigan wins by over 14.5 points | — | — | — | — | — |
Michigan wins by over 21.5 points | — | — | — | — | — |
Michigan wins by over 24.5 points | — | — | — | — | — |
Michigan wins by over 45.5 points | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 31.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 37.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 43.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 47.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 55.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 61.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 67.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Over 70.5 points scored | — | — | — | — | — |
Michigan Wolverines
97.2% avg
Official settlement criteria, resolution sources, and edge cases across Kalshi and Novig and Polymarket and Polymarket US and ProphetX.
KalshiIf UTEP wins the UTEP vs Michigan college football game originally scheduled for Sep 19, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.
If the game is postponed but begins within 48 hours of its originally scheduled start time, the market will remain open and resolve based on the official final result. If the game is cancelled or not started within 48 hours of its originally scheduled start, the market will resolve to a fair price. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the NCAA. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners.
NovigUTEP Miners in UTEP @ Michigan (NCAAF); settled by Novig.
If the contract cannot be settled on the stated outcome, Novig settles it at fair market value (FMV) instead of refunding it.
PolymarketIn the upcoming college football game between UTEP and Michigan, scheduled for September 19 at 3:30PM ET: This market will resolve to "UTEP" if UTEP win the game. This market will resolve to "Michigan" if Michigan win the game. Overtime is included if played. If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50. If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
Polymarket USThis market will settle to the winner of the UTEP vs Michigan College Football game scheduled for Sep 19, 2026. Overtime is included if played. If a tied final score is reported and no official winner is declared, this market will not resolve automatically and will be reviewed against the official governing-body result. If the game is delayed, postponed, or suspended and not rescheduled to a date within two weeks of the originally scheduled date, the market will settle to the last fair market price. Outcome sourced from the relevant governing body.
Sports moneyline - resolves based on official game outcome per ProphetX Prediction Rules
The outcomes listed above show how traders are pricing this question. Compare outcome prices from Kalshi, Polymarket US, Novig, Polymarket, ProphetX in one place. Each price reflects the market’s implied probability, not a guaranteed result. This event is archived; prices shown are historical.
The last available prices are Michigan Wolverines: 96.5¢ on Kalshi, 98.4¢ on Polymarket, 97.1¢ on ProphetX, 95.0¢ on Polymarket US, 98.9¢ on Novig; UTEP Miners: 3.5¢ on Kalshi, 1.6¢ on Polymarket, 5.1¢ on ProphetX, 5.0¢ on Polymarket US, 1.1¢ on Novig. Prices are quoted in cents per $1 share. Check the venue for executable prices and available liquidity. The last available price is not necessarily the final settlement price.
The largest price difference shown across venues is 4.0 percentage points. Venues have different traders, liquidity and fees, so their prices can differ. A price gap alone does not establish an executable arbitrage opportunity; compare settlement rules and the actual buy and sell prices.
For example, Michigan Wolverines at 97.2¢ implies about a 97.2% chance. For a standard $1 contract, a share pays $1 if its outcome settles as correct and $0 if it settles as incorrect. A winning share bought at 40¢ earns 60¢ before fees. Check each venue’s settlement rules, fees and eligibility before trading. Historical prices alone do not identify the winning outcome.